Shop
  • Deals
  • Deal checker
  • Black Friday
  • Buying guides
  • Brands
  • Stores
Travel
  • Flight deals
  • Hotel deals
Company
  • Research
  • Press
  • deal.ai apps
Black Friday 2026
  • Walmart
  • Best Buy
  • Target
  • TVs
  • Laptops
  • Headphones
  • Apple
  • Gaming
  • Vacuums
  • Kitchen
  • Toys
  • Smartwatches
  • Tablets
  • Furniture
  • Mattresses
© Deal.ai Inc.
TermsPrivacy
Deal.ai › Compare

AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4

Buy the Athlon 3000G for a cheap, low-power desktop build with working integrated graphics and a modern AM4 upgrade path. Buy the Xeon E5-2697 v4 only if you need 18 cores and 36 threads for rendering or virtualization and already have an LGA2011-3 board. The Athlon is a budget part; the Xeon is a used server chip, so check current prices at each store before deciding.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.

Enter to send, Shift+Enter for a new line

AMD
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Processor

AMD Athlon 3000G

AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Processor

See all prices and details

Choose the Athlon 3000G if you want a simple, quiet, low-power PC for office work, browsing and 1080p video without a graphics card.

Pros
  • Runs cool at 35 W and stays quiet
  • Integrated Vega 3 graphics means no GPU purchase
  • Unlocked for easy overclocking
  • Cheap AM4 boards and DDR4 are widely available
Cons

What separates them

AMD Athlon 3000GIntel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Cores and threads2 cores, 4 threads18 cores, 36 threads
Clock speed3.5 GHz base, 3.8 GHz boost with overclock2.3 GHz base
Integrated graphicsRadeon Vega 3, 1080p output, no discrete card neededNone; a discrete GPU is required
Socket and platformAM4, current boards and DDR4LGA2011-3, older server boards and DDR4 ECC
Thermal design power35 W145 W
CacheSmall L2/L3 cache suited to light tasks45 MB cache
OverclockingUnlocked, supports overclockingLocked multiplier

Price history

  • AMD Athlon 3000G: lowest $29.99 on Nov 3 at eBay.
  • Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4: lowest $356.00 on Nov 3 at Global One Technology.

Prices at every store

AMD Athlon 3000G

  • eBayCheck price at eBay
  • Newegg.comCheck price at Newegg.com
  • NextWarehouse.comCheck price at NextWarehouse.com

Store links may earn us a commission.

Prices and history →

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4

  • CPU MedicsCheck price at CPU Medics
  • directmacro.comCheck price at directmacro.com
  • ServerSupply.comCheck price at ServerSupply.com
Prices and history →

Specs compared

SpecAMD Athlon 3000GIntel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Socket TypeAM4Socket LGA2011-3
Clock Speed3.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Number Of Cores218-core
Motherboard Socket TypeAM4—
RAM TypeDDR4—
RAM Maximum Capacity16GB—
RAM Speed2667 MHz—
GPU ManufacturerAMD—
GPU ModelRadeon Vega 3 Graphics—
GPU SeriesVega, Radeon—
Manufacturer

What reviewers say

AMD Athlon 3000G

Owners treat the Athlon 3000G as a capable low-cost chip for basic desktops and media PCs. They like the integrated graphics and low heat, but call out the two cores as a ceiling for heavier workloads.

What people mention
  • PerformanceMixedFine for office work and browsing, but two cores limit multitasking and heavier software.
  • Integrated graphicsMixedVega 3 handles 1080p video and desktop use, but only light or older games.
  • Power and heatPraisedThe 35 W TDP keeps temperatures and fan noise low, even with the stock cooler.
  • OverclockingPraised

Questions and answers

Which is better for gaming?
The Athlon 3000G, because it has integrated Vega 3 graphics and needs no GPU to boot. The Xeon has no graphics at all, and its 2.3 GHz clock is poor for games even with a card.
Which is better for video editing?
The Xeon E5-2697 v4. Its 18 cores and 36 threads cut render and export times far below what a 2-core Athlon can do.
Does the Xeon need a graphics card?
Yes. The E5-2697 v4 has no integrated graphics, so you need a discrete GPU or a board with basic video output to get a display.
Which uses less power?
The Athlon 3000G at 35 W. The Xeon is rated around 145 W, so it needs a larger cooler and power supply.
Can I upgrade the Athlon later?
Yes. AM4 boards accept many newer Ryzen chips, so you can swap in a faster CPU without changing the motherboard.
Is the Xeon worth it over the Athlon?
Only for multithreaded work. For browsing, office apps and media, the Athlon is cheaper to build and run.

More comparisons

  • AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Processor vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
  • AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Processor vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Processor
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 Processor
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Processor vs Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 Processor
  • Only 2 cores; struggles with heavy multitasking
  • Vega 3 is weak for modern games
  • Dual-channel DDR4 at 2667 MHz limits memory bandwidth
Intel
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 Processor

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 Processor

See all prices and details

Choose the Xeon E5-2697 v4 if your workload is heavily multithreaded, such as video encoding, 3D rendering or running several virtual machines.

Pros
  • 18 cores and 36 threads for heavy parallel work
  • 45 MB cache helps large datasets
  • Strong multi-core throughput for the money on the used market
Cons
  • No integrated graphics; you must add a GPU
  • 145 W TDP needs a serious cooler and power supply
  • LGA2011-3 boards are old and scarce
Best workloadEveryday desktop, media, light gamingHeavy multithreaded work on a budget
AMD
—
Discrete GraphicsNo—
Show all 25 specsShow fewer specs
SpecAMD Athlon 3000GIntel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Integrated GraphicsYes—
GPU TypeIntegrated—
Output Resolution1080p—
Memory TypeDDR4—
Max Memory Capacity64GB—
Memory Speed2667 MHz—
Memory Channel SupportDual Channel—
Boost Clock Speed3.8GHz (reported max clock speed with overclock)—
Number Of Threads4—
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W—
Supports OverclockingYes—
FSB Speed3200 MHz—
Cache Memory—45 MB cache memory
Owners report modest overclocks on inexpensive AM4 boards.

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4

Owner reports on used-market forums are positive about multi-core value for home labs and rendering, while noting weak single-thread speed and platform age.

What people mention
  • Multi-core performancePraisedOwners say the 18 cores handle virtualization and rendering well for the money.
  • Single-thread speedCriticisedThe 2.3 GHz base clock makes lightly threaded work feel slow.
  • Power and heatCriticisedFull-load runs draw high power and need serious cooling.
  • Platform ageMixedLGA2011-3 boards are cheap used but getting harder to find in good condition.