Which is better for wet weather?

Both use Gore-Tex. The Lowa is listed as fully waterproof; the Asolo is listed as water-resistant with Gore-Tex Extended Comfort. For sustained rain and stream crossings, the Lowa has the edge.

Which is better for day hikes?

The Asolo. Its lighter, more flexible build and low-profile lugs suit shorter hikes and casual wear. The Lowa is stiffer and better for long days with a pack.

Is the Lowa worth the extra money?

At $117.48 (Backcountry.com, November 8, 2026) versus $95.89 for the Asolo (November 3, 2026), the Lowa's premium buys a Vibram sole, a stiffer midsole and a warmth rating. If you hike rough or cold terrain, yes.

The Lowa's Vibram outsole and stiffer DynaPU midsole are built for more abrasive terrain and typically wear slower. The Asolo's softer EVA midsole will compress sooner with heavy use.

Which is better for cold weather?

The Lowa, which carries a 3/5 insulation rating. The Asolo has no insulation rating, so pair it with warmer socks in cold conditions.

Do both come in women's-specific fits?

Yes. Both are listed as women's-specific mid-cut hiking boots.

Asolo Supertrek GV Hiking Boot vs Lowa Women's Toro Pro GTX Mid Boots

Both are women's mid-cut suede hiking boots with Gore-Tex waterproofing and stability-focused soles. The Asolo Supertrek GV is the lighter, more flexible choice for day hikes and mixed wet-dry trails. The Lowa Toro Pro GTX Mid has a stiffer Vibram Multi Trac II sole and a warmth rating, so it suits longer, colder, rougher outings. On price, the Asolo has been seen at $95.89 (November 3, 2026) and the Lowa at $117.48 at Backcountry.com as of November 8, 2026.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.