Which is better for pet hair?

The bObsweep is the safer pick. It is marketed for pet owners, has 8,000 Pa suction and a 6L base that compresses pet hair into a bag. The Roborock has more suction on paper but a smaller dust capacity.

The Roborock QR 798 at 45 dB is quieter than the bObsweep at 60 dB. That gap is noticeable in an open living room.

Is the Roborock worth the extra $62?

Only if quiet operation and the larger 1.32-gallon capacity matter to you. Otherwise the bObsweep gives more documented features, including Google Assistant support and a 170-minute battery, for less.

Which has better smart home support?

The bObsweep. It works with Alexa and Google Assistant, while the Roborock lists Amazon Alexa only.

Which lasts longer on a charge?

The bObsweep is rated at 170 minutes per charge. Roborock does not publish a runtime for the QR 798, so it cannot be compared directly.

Which has more owner feedback?

The bObsweep, with 4.4 from 1,000 ratings. The Roborock scores higher at 4.7 but from only 169 ratings.

bObsweep UltraVision Robot Vacuum & Mop vs Roborock QR 798 Robot Vacuum & Mop

Buy the bObsweep UltraVision if you want the lower price and a proven self-emptying vacuum-mop with 8,000 Pa suction and a 6L base. Buy the Roborock QR 798 if quiet operation and a bigger dust capacity matter more than saving money. As of November 7, 2026, the bObsweep is $239.99 at Best Buy and the Roborock is $302.00 at eBay. The bObsweep has far more owner ratings (4.4 from 1,000 versus 4.7 from 169), so its track record is easier to judge.

Today the bObsweep UltraVision Robot Vacuum & Mop costs $190.00 less at its best price.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.