Which is better for a long trip?

The Energizer. Its 30,000mAh capacity covers several days of phone charging and can top up a tablet. The Anker's 10,000mAh is a one-day pack.

Which charges an iPhone faster?

The Anker over USB-C at up to 30W. The Energizer's MagSafe wireless charging is convenient but slower, and its 22.5W figure applies to the USB-A port.

Is the Energizer too heavy to carry daily?

At 595 g it is about the weight of a large water bottle. It suits a backpack; the Anker is the one you slip in a jacket pocket.

Does the Anker charge wirelessly?

No. It is wired only, but it has a built-in foldable USB-C cable, so you do not need to bring one.

Can the Energizer charge Android phones?

Yes, through the USB-A port at up to 22.5W. MagSafe wireless charging is aimed at iPhones.

Which lasts longer between charges?

The Energizer, by capacity alone: 30,000mAh versus 10,000mAh. Battery lifespan in years depends on cycle count and heat, and the Anker's temperature sensor helps there.

Energizer UE30055PQ MagSafe Power Bank vs Anker Nano Power Bank 10K 30W

Pick the Anker Nano if you want a pocketable 10,000mAh pack that charges a phone fast over USB-C. Pick the Energizer UE30055PQ if you need a large 30,000mAh reserve and like the convenience of MagSafe wireless charging. The Energizer weighs 595 g, roughly five to six times the Anker, so it is a bag pack, not a pocket one.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.