Which is better for overpronation?

The Asics GT-1000 13. It pairs stability support with the 3D Guidance System, while the Rincon 4 is neutral only.

The Hoka Rincon 4. Hoka builds it around a high cushion-to-weight ratio; the GT-1000 13 weighs 270 g / 9.5 oz.

Is the Asics worth the extra over the Hoka?

It is not extra right now. The GT-1000 13 is $56.00 at Walmart as of November 7, 2026, below the Rincon 4 at $62.49 at Foot Locker.

Hard to say from specs. Hoka says the Rincon 4's upgraded foam and podular outsole extend life; Asics uses a durable outsole and OrthoLite sockliner.

Which is better for long runs?

The GT-1000 13 if you want guided stability and PureGEL cushioning. The Rincon 4 suits runners who prefer a light, soft feel.

Can I use either for walking?

Both are running shoes. The Rincon 4 is listed for running only, and the GT-1000 13 is built for daily training, so a dedicated walking shoe may suit you better.

Hoka Rincon 4 Women's Running Shoe vs Asics GT-1000 13

Buy the Asics GT-1000 13 if you overpronate or want a stable daily trainer with a roomy, supportive ride. Buy the Hoka Rincon 4 if you want the lightest possible neutral shoe for tempo days and easy miles. The GT-1000 13 is $56.00 at Walmart as of November 7, 2026, and the Rincon 4 is $62.49 at Foot Locker as of November 7, 2026, so the Asics is about $6 cheaper right now.

Today the Asics GT-1000 13 costs $6.49 less at its best price.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.