Which is better for wet weather?

The Lowa, because it uses a GORE-TEX lining, a membrane with a long track record for waterproof-breathable performance. The KEEN is waterproof too, but its membrane is KEEN's own and not GORE-TEX.

Which is better for rocky, technical trails?

The KEEN. Its 4mm multi-directional lugs and stability-focused sole are built for grip and control on uneven ground. The Lowa's Fast Hiking sole is lighter and better suited to maintained trails.

Is the Lowa worth it over the KEEN?

At current prices, yes for most day hikers: $95.98 versus $119.97, plus GORE-TEX and cold padding. The KEEN earns its extra cost only if you need maximum lug grip and a stability-focused sole.

The KEEN's rubber lug outsole and more substantial build should hold up longer on abrasive rock. The Lowa's lighter synthetic sole and textile upper favor lighter use.

Which fits wider feet?

The KEEN. KEEN boots are known for a roomier toe box. The Lowa Maddox Pro runs closer to standard width, so try it on if you have wide feet.

Which is better for cold-weather hiking?

The Lowa, which lists cold padding and an all-season build. The KEEN has no insulation listed, so it suits milder conditions.

KEEN Zionic NXT Mid Waterproof Hiking Boot vs Lowa Maddox Pro GTX Mid Women's Boot

The Lowa Maddox Pro GTX Mid is the better value at $95.98 at Steep & Cheap as of November 7, 2026, versus $119.97 for the KEEN Zionic NXT Mid at eBay. Pick the Lowa for a lighter, GORE-TEX-lined boot with a proven waterproof membrane and a lower price. Pick the KEEN if you want a more cushioned, stability-focused boot with a wider toe box and a lug pattern built for mixed terrain.

Today the Lowa Maddox Pro GTX Mid Women's Boot costs $23.99 less at its best price.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.