Which is better for video?

Both record 3K Ultra HD. The Headliner lists 30 fps and 32 GB of storage; the Meta Ray-Ban Meta lists a 100° field of view. Pick the Headliner for storage and the other pair for a wider shot.

Which lasts longer on a charge?

Both are rated up to 8 hours, and both cases add about 48 hours. The Meta Ray-Ban Meta adds fast charging to 50% in 20 minutes, which the Headliner does not list.

Is the Headliner worth it over the other pair?

At $204.95 as of November 3 versus $379.00 as of October 31, the Headliner costs far less for the same camera and video specs. The extra money on the other pair buys the wider hinge and fast charging.

Which fits a smaller or wider face?

The Headliner comes in low-bridge (53 g) and high-bridge (51 g) fits. The Meta Ray-Ban Meta has a hinge opening 10 degrees wider than standard, which helps with a wider head.

Do they have the same camera?

Both use a 12 MP camera. The Headliner calls it ultra-wide; the Meta Ray-Ban Meta lists a 100° field of view. Expect similar photos.

Which is better for calls?

The Meta Ray-Ban Meta claims 90% background noise blocked. The Headliner uses a custom 5-mic array. Both are built for calls; try them if call quality matters most.

Ray-Ban Meta (Gen 2) Smart Glasses vs Ray-Ban Meta Headliner (Gen 2)

Both are Gen 2 Ray-Ban Meta glasses with the same core hardware: 12 MP camera, 3K video, up to 8 hours of battery and a charging case with about 48 more hours. The real difference is frame shape and price. The Headliner is round and was $204.95 at the low end as of November 3, while the Meta Ray-Ban Meta was $379.00 as of October 31. Buy the Headliner if you want the round look and the lower price; buy the other pair if you prefer its standard frame shape and wider hinge opening.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.