New Balance 471 vs New Balance Women's 237 Sneaker
Both are retro New Balance lifestyle sneakers with EVA midsoles and exposed foam tongues. The 237 is the safer pick for most shoppers: it has a stronger rating from far more buyers (4.4 from 4,600 vs 4.3 from 1,300) and a more supportive, cushioned ride. The 471 is the cheaper buy right now: $40.97 at Going Going Gone as of November 3, 2026, versus the 237's typical full retail. Pick the 471 if price and a slimmer, low-profile look matter most; pick the 237 if you want all-day comfort and a wider, more stable fit.
Ask our shopping agent
New Balance 471
4.3Choose the New Balance 471 if you want a slim, low-profile retro runner at a steep discount and your feet are narrow to medium.
- Cheap right now at $40.97, well below typical retail
- Slim, low-profile retro silhouette that dresses up
- Lightweight with decent cushioning for casual wear
- Breathable mesh underlays; machine washable per the listing
- Runs narrow; some buyers get heel blisters
- Little arch support
- Exposed foam tongue and heel rubber show wear
What separates them
| New Balance 471 | New Balance Women's 237 Sneaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $40.97 at Going Going Gone as of November 3, 2026 | Typically sells near full retail; check current store prices |
| Owner rating | 4.3 out of 5 from 1,300 ratings | 4.4 out of 5 from 4,600 ratings |
| Fit | Runs narrow for some buyers; true to size for most | Roomier, more forgiving women's fit |
| Cushioning and support | EVA midsole with herringbone outsole; buyers report little arch support | EVA midsole with foam footbed; described as all-day comfortable |
| Upper | Hairy suede overlays, mesh, leather accents, 'Fang' toe overlay | Unbacked suede, mesh and nylon with asymmetric rubber toe wrap |
| Outsole | Classic herringbone rubber | Large-scale ripple outsole with text branding |
| Weight | Lightweight per buyers | 257 g (9.1 oz) |
Price history
- New Balance 471: lowest $33.00 on Oct 30 at Shopbop; $39.98 on Nov 3.
- New Balance Women's 237 Sneaker: lowest $50.97 on Oct 31 at Kohl's.
Prices at every store
New Balance 471
- JourneysNew
In stock
$39.98+ $7.99 shippingObserved at 8:00 AM - DICK'S Sporting GoodsNew
In stock
$40.97+ $9.99 shippingObserved at 8:00 AM - Going Going GoneNew
Availability unknown
$40.97Observed at 2:13 AM - StockXNew
Availability unknown
$49.00Observed at 2:13 AM
Also available at
- eBayCheck price at eBay
- WalmartCheck price at Walmart
- ScheelsCheck price at Scheels
Specs compared
| Spec | New Balance 471 | New Balance Women's 237 Sneaker |
|---|---|---|
| Width | Width Medium | — |
| Department | Men's, Women's | — |
| Material | Genuine Leather, Genuine Suede, Mesh, Nylon, Ru… | — |
| Color | Pink/Red | — |
| Fashion Sneaker | Yes | — |
| Closure Style | Lace-up | — |
| Style | Casual | — |
| Type | Sneakers | — |
| Breathable | Yes | — |
| Care Instructions | Machine Wash | — |
| Support Type | Cushioning |
Questions and answers
- Which is better for all-day standing and walking?
- The 237. Its foam footbed and roomier fit draw fewer comfort complaints, and it rates higher across far more reviews. The 471 is fine for casual wear but buyers report thin arch support.
- Is the 471 worth buying over the 237 because it is cheaper?
- At $40.97 at Going Going Gone as of November 3, 2026, yes if budget is the priority and your feet are narrow. If you need support or have wide feet, the 237 is worth the extra.
- Which runs narrower?
- The 471. Buyers repeatedly say it runs narrow, and some report toe crowding and heel blisters. The 237 fits roomier and is the safer choice for wide feet.
- Which lasts longer?
- The 237 has fewer durability complaints. 471 owners mention heel rubber fading and the exposed foam tongue degrading, though both use similar EVA and rubber construction.
- Do both have the exposed foam tongue?
- Yes. Both use an exposed foam tongue as a retro detail. It is a cosmetic feature on both, and it can wear over time.
- Are these actual running shoes?
- No. Both are lifestyle sneakers with EVA midsoles. The 471 is listed under running shoes, but neither is built for regular training.