Which is better for snowshoeing?

The Oboz Bangtail Mid. It is built for winter hiking and snowshoeing, with a lighter build and Vibram Arctic Grip. The Chilkat III is more of an everyday snow boot.

Which keeps feet drier in deep snow?

The North Face Chilkat III. Its 6 in. shaft and injection-molded waterproof TPR shell cover more of the foot and ankle than the mid-height Oboz.

Which has better traction on ice?

The Oboz, on paper. Vibram Arctic Grip is designed for wet ice. The Chilkat III uses IcePick temperature-sensitive lugs, which also harden in cold but are a step below Arctic Grip.

The Oboz Bangtail Mid at about 2 lb 10 oz per pair. The Chilkat III is listed at 1.5 kg, roughly 3 lb 5 oz.

Are both warm enough for below-freezing days?

Both use 200 g synthetic insulation, so warmth is similar. The Chilkat III's taller shaft and shell add protection in deep snow and wind.

Is the Oboz worth extra money over the Chilkat III?

Only if you hike or snowshoe in winter. For shoveling, commuting and daily wear, the Chilkat III covers more of the leg for less. Check current prices on this page before deciding.

Oboz Bangtail Mid Insulated Waterproof Hiking Boots - Men's vs The North Face Chilkat III Men's Insulated Boot

Both are 200 g insulated waterproof winter boots. The Oboz Bangtail Mid is the better pick for winter hiking and snowshoeing, thanks to Vibram Arctic Grip and a lighter build. The North Face Chilkat III is the better pick for deep snow, shoveling and everyday cold-weather wear, with a taller shaft and a waterproof TPR shell. No current prices were provided for either boot, so compare store prices on this page before deciding.

Ask our shopping agent