- Which is warmer?
- The Patagonia has higher fill power (800 vs 700) at similar overall weight class, but the Fjällräven adds a hood and synthetic shoulder insulation. For cold, windy days with a pack, the Fjällräven's hood and shoulders win. For warmth per ounce, the Patagonia wins.
- Which is better for hiking with a backpack?
- The Fjällräven. Its synthetic insulation over the shoulders holds up better under pack straps and moisture. The Patagonia's thin 20-denier shell is the one reviewers say develops pinholes.
- Is the Fjällräven worth the extra $26.99?
- Yes if you want a hood and shoulder insulation; those are the main things the Patagonia lacks. If you layer under a shell and don't need a hood, the Patagonia is lighter and cheaper.
- Which packs down smaller?
- Both pack into their own pockets. The Patagonia is 121 g lighter and uses higher fill power, so it compresses smaller overall.
- Which lasts longer?
- The Fjällräven has the better durability reputation here. The Patagonia's shell is the most common complaint from reviewers, with pinholes and a fragile lining reported.
- Do either have a hood?
- Only the Fjällräven Expedition Pack Down Hoodie has a hood. The Patagonia Down Sweater has a collar with a zipper garage at the chin.