Which is faster, the Samsung PM9B1 or the Kingston UV500?

The Samsung PM9B1. It is NVMe over PCIe and reads at about 3,500 MB/s versus about 520 MB/s for the SATA-based UV500. Real-world boot and load times differ by several seconds.

Will the Kingston UV500 work in my laptop?

Only if the M.2 slot supports SATA. Many modern laptops accept NVMe only, so check your model's spec sheet before buying. The PM9B1 needs an NVMe-capable slot.

Is 256 GB enough, or should I get a larger UV500?

256 GB covers an OS and everyday apps but fills quickly with games and video. If you need more room and your slot is SATA, a 480 GB or 960 GB UV500 makes sense; otherwise buy a larger NVMe drive.

Both use TLC NAND and carry multi-year warranties, but endurance scales with capacity. A 960 GB UV500 has a higher total-bytes-written rating than a 256 GB PM9B1, though the Samsung is far faster per gigabyte.

Is the Samsung worth the extra money?

Yes for any NVMe-capable machine. The speed gap is large and felt daily in boot, app launch and file copy times. The UV500 only wins when compatibility or a very low price drives the decision.

Samsung PM9B1 256GB NVMe SSD vs Kingston UV500 M.2 SSD

Buy the Samsung PM9B1 for speed: it is a PCIe NVMe drive with roughly 3,500 MB/s sequential reads, while the Kingston UV500 runs on SATA at about 520 MB/s. Buy the Kingston UV500 only if you need a SATA M.2 drive for an older laptop or a cheap small-capacity boot disk. The PM9B1 256 GB is the better value per gigabyte at current street prices, but check the live comparison on Deal.ai before you buy.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.