Which is better for pet hair?

The Shark WANDVAC. It has 115 air watts, a brushless motor and an included Multi-Surface Pet Tool, while the dustbuster is rated 35 air watts and lists hard floors as its surface type.

Which has longer battery life?

The Black+Decker. It runs up to 25 minutes on a 5-hour charge. Shark does not publish a runtime for the WANDVAC, which is built for short pickups.

Is the Shark worth the extra $40?

If you clean upholstery or pet hair, yes: more suction, half the weight and HEPA filtration. For hard floors and car crevices, the dustbuster does the job for less.

Which is easier to carry around the house?

The Shark at 1.4 lb. The dustbuster weighs 3.3 lb, more than twice as much.

Do either have HEPA filtration?

Only the Shark WANDVAC lists a HEPA filter. The Black+Decker uses a washable filter and is not HEPA certified.

Which bin holds more?

The Black+Decker at 750 ml, versus about 0.3 L (0.08 gal) on the Shark, so you empty it less often.

Shark WANDVAC Cordless Handheld Vacuum vs Black+Decker dustbuster AdvancedClean+

The Shark WANDVAC is the better pick for pet hair and upholstery: 115 air watts, a brushless motor, a HEPA filter and a pet tool, at $99.99 at Best Buy as of November 6, 2026. The Black+Decker dustbuster AdvancedClean+ is the cheaper, longer-running choice for hard floors and crevices, at $59.99 at Amazon as of November 6, 2026. The Shark costs about $40 more but is roughly half the weight and twice the suction on paper.

Today the Black+Decker dustbuster AdvancedClean+ costs $40.00 less at its best price.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.