Which is warmer in wet snow?

The Arctic, because its 150g Heatseeker Eco synthetic fill keeps insulating when damp, while the Bedford relies on 550-fill down alone. Both have waterproof DryVent shells.

The Bedford lists a 33.5-inch center back, which is mid-thigh on most wearers. The Arctic is described as thigh-length. They are close, so try both if length matters.

Is the Arctic worth the extra $40?

Only if you want the women's fit and the synthetic blend for wet weather. At $229.97 versus $190 at eBay as of November 4, 2026, the Bedford is the better value on paper.

Does either have a fur hood?

Only the Bedford, and the faux-fur ruff is removable. The Arctic listing does not mention a fur trim.

How many pockets does each have?

The Bedford has two zip chest and hand pockets, four hook-and-loop front pockets and an interior zip pocket. Pocket details for the Arctic are not published.

Which has more reliable ratings?

The Bedford's 4.6 out of 5 comes from 36 ratings; the Arctic's 5 out of 5 comes from just 3. Treat the Arctic score as weak evidence.

The North Face Men's Bedford Down Parka Insulated Winter Jacket vs The North Face Women's Arctic Insulated Parka Winter Coat Jacket

The Bedford is the better buy for most shoppers: it is a men's cut, longer at 33.5 inches, and costs $190 at eBay as of November 4, 2026, versus $229.97 for the Arctic at eBay the same day. The Arctic is a women's thigh-length parka with a mixed down and Heatseeker Eco fill, so pick it if you want that fit and the extra synthetic warmth in wet weather. Neither is cheap, but the Bedford gives you more jacket per dollar right now.

Today the The North Face Men's Bedford Down Parka Insulated Winter Jacket costs $39.97 less at its best price.

Ask our shopping agent