XTEP 160X8.0 Pro 'Cyan Yellow' Running Shoes vs Xtep 260X 2.0
The 160X8.0 Pro is the faster, lighter racing shoe: 179 g, a full-length GT700 carbon plate, and a 36.7 mm heel stack. The 260X 2.0 is the cheaper, more forgiving carbon-plated trainer with a T400 plate and water-repellent upper. The 260X 2.0 was listed at $130.00 at Novelship; no price was given for the 160X8.0 Pro. Buy the Pro for race day and the 260X 2.0 for most of your weekly miles.
Ask our shopping agent
XTEP 160X8.0 Pro 'Cyan Yellow' Running Shoes
Choose the 160X8.0 Pro if you race or time-trial and want the lightest, stiffest carbon-plated option Xtep makes.
- Very light at 179 g, 17% lighter than its predecessor.
- Full-length GT700 carbon plate gives strong propulsion.
- Dual-density foam balances springiness and stability.
- Outsole rated for over 2,000 km.
- No price was listed, so cost is unclear.
- Stiff racing plate suits fast paces, not easy recovery runs.
- No water-repellent treatment listed.
- Released August 2026, so long-term wear data is thin.
What separates them
| XTEP 160X8.0 Pro 'Cyan Yellow' Running Shoes | Xtep 260X 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 179 g (US 8 / EU 41) | Not listed; heavier training build |
| Carbon plate | Full-length GT700 | T400 carbon fiber |
| Midsole foam | Dual-density XTEP ACE, 38°/42° hardness | XTEPace midsole |
| Heel stack | 36.7 mm heel, 30.5 mm forefoot | Not listed |
| Outsole durability | XTEP DURA CPU rubber, rated over 2,000 km | Rubber outsole, no durability rating |
| Water resistance | Not listed | Water repellent |
| Price | Not given | $130.00 at Novelship |
Price history
- XTEP 160X8.0 Pro 'Cyan Yellow' Running Shoes: lowest $230.00 on Oct 29.
- Xtep 260X 2.0: lowest $130.00 on Oct 29.
Specs compared
| Spec | XTEP 160X8.0 Pro 'Cyan Yellow' Running Shoes | Xtep 260X 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon Plate | Full-length GT700 carbon plate | T400 carbon fiber plate |
| Weight | 179g (Men's US 8 / EU 41) | — |
| Heel Stack Height | 36.7 mm | — |
| Forefoot Stack Height | 30.5 mm | — |
| Upper Material | Lightweight engineered mesh | — |
| Midsole Foam | Dual-density XTEP ACE foam | — |
| Upper Foam Hardness | 38° | — |
| Lower Foam Hardness | 42° | — |
| Outsole Material | XTEP DURA CPU Rubber | — |
| Outsole Durability | over 2,000 kilometers |
What reviewers say
XTEP 160X8.0 Pro 'Cyan Yellow' Running Shoes
Reception for the 160X line centers on its light weight and propulsive plate ride at a price below Western super-shoes. The 8.0 Pro is new, so long-term durability reports are still thin.
- Light weight for the stack height
- Strong forward roll from the carbon plate
- Competitive price versus major-brand race shoes
- Firm, unforgiving ride at easy paces
- Fit runs narrow for some runners
- Hard to find in Western retail
Xtep 260X 2.0
The 260X line is well regarded among runners as a value carbon-plated racer, with the plate and foam praised for pace work. Feedback on the 2.0 specifically is thinner, so treat claims as line-level rather than model-specific.
- Noticeable forward roll and pop from the plate
Questions and answers
- Which is better for a marathon?
- The 160X8.0 Pro is the race-day pick: lighter, with a stiffer GT700 plate and a 36.7 mm stack. The 260X 2.0 is the better choice for the long training runs leading up to it.
- Is the 160X8.0 Pro worth the extra over the 260X 2.0?
- Only if you race. The Pro's weight and plate grade favor fast efforts, while the 260X 2.0 at $130.00 at Novelship covers daily mileage for less. No price was listed for the Pro, so compare at checkout.
- Which lasts longer?
- Xtep rates the 160X8.0 Pro outsole at over 2,000 km, which is a strong claim. The 260X 2.0 has no published durability figure, so the Pro has the clearer edge on paper.
- Which is better in rain?
- The 260X 2.0 has a water-repellent upper. The 160X8.0 Pro lists no water resistance, so it is the drier-weather racer.
- Which suits heavier runners?
- The 260X 2.0's hollowed midfoot and shank add stability, and its foam is less aggressive. The Pro's stiff plate and low weight favor lighter, faster runners.
- Do both have carbon plates?
- Yes. The 160X8.0 Pro uses a full-length GT700 plate; the 260X 2.0 uses a T400 carbon fiber plate. The GT700 is the higher-grade, stiffer option.