Which is better for close-range hog hunting?

The AGM Rattler V2 25-256. Its 3.5x base magnification, light 1.08 lb body and 11.5-hour battery suit short-range work, and you do not pay for a rangefinder you will not use at 50-100 yards.

Which has the better image at long range?

The ATN Thor 5 LRF. A 640x480 12-micron sensor shows much more detail than 256x192, which matters for identifying animals past a few hundred yards.

Do I need the ATN's laser rangefinder?

Only if you shoot at varying distances where a misjudged range costs a miss. The AGM has no rangefinder, so you range separately or hold off known distances.

Which is easier to carry?

The AGM at 1.08 lb, roughly half the ATN's 2.05 lb. That matters on long walks or when the scope sits on a light rifle.

How long does each run on a battery?

The AGM is rated up to 11.5 hours on one NE-4400, and two batteries are included. ATN does not state a battery life in the listed specs, so confirm it before an all-night hunt.

Is the ATN worth the extra money?

If you need a 640x480 image, a rangefinder and a ballistic calculator, yes. If you hunt inside 200-300 yards, the AGM covers it for less.

AGM Rattler V2 25-256 Thermal Imaging Riflescope vs ATN Thor 5 LRF 4-32x 640x480 12 Micron Smart HD Thermal Rifle Scope, 30mm Tube

Buy the AGM Rattler V2 25-256 for close-range night hunting on a tight budget: it is light at 1.08 lb, runs up to 11.5 hours on one replaceable NE-4400 battery, and ships with two batteries. Buy the ATN Thor 5 LRF if you need to identify and range targets past a few hundred yards: its 640x480 12-micron sensor, built-in laser rangefinder and ballistic calculator do that, at 2.05 lb and a much higher price. No prices were provided for either scope, so compare current store prices on this page before deciding.

Ask our shopping agent