Which is better for steep, rocky scrambling?

The Scarpa Zodiac Tech GTX. Its Vibram BAS Precision outsole and flat climbing toe zone are built for edging on rock, while the Asolo Fugitive GTX is a general trail boot that can slip on smooth granite.

Which is better for wet winter hiking?

Both are waterproof and uninsulated. The Asolo's GORE-TEX lining and rubber toe cap suit slush and wet trails; the Scarpa's Perwanger suede adds water repellency and a rubber rand for rock contact.

Is the Scarpa worth the extra money?

Only if you hike technical ground. At recent lows the Scarpa was $199.50 versus $154.11 for the Asolo, about $45 more, and that buys a stiffer, more precise sole rather than more comfort.

The Scarpa's full suede leather upper and rubber rand generally resist abrasion better than the Asolo's suede and nylon mix. The Asolo is lighter and more flexible, which some hikers prefer for long easy miles.

Which is more comfortable for long easy trails?

The Asolo Fugitive GTX. Its softer PU midsole and flexible upper suit all-day walking, while the Scarpa's stiffer 2D PU midsole is tuned for stability on steep terrain.

Do either come in wide sizes?

The Scarpa is listed at medium width. The Asolo listing gives no width, so try both on if you have wide feet.

Asolo Fugitive GTX Hiking Boots vs Scarpa Zodiac Tech GTX Hiking Boots

The Asolo Fugitive GTX is the better value for most hikers: a proven GORE-TEX boot with a rubber toe cap, and its lowest recent price was $154.11 on October 31, well under the Scarpa's $199.50 on November 1. The Scarpa Zodiac Tech GTX is the pick for rough, steep terrain, where its Vibram BAS Precision outsole and flat climbing toe zone grip better. Both are waterproof, uninsulated winter-capable boots, so choose on terrain and budget rather than warmth.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.