Which is better for wet weather?

The Blundstone 500. Its leather is water-resistant and it has no laces to soak through. The 1460's patent leather has no stated water resistance.

Which is easier to put on?

The Blundstone 500. It is a pull-on Chelsea with elastic side panels. The 1460 is lace-up.

Is the Blundstone worth the extra $90?

If you want water resistance, a removable footbed and a steel shank, yes. If you want a lace-up combat look at a lower price, the 1460 is the better buy.

Both are built to resole. The Blundstone lists a steel shank and heat-resistant TPU outsole; the 1460 lists a synthetic outsole. Neither maker gives a wear-life figure.

Which is better for cold weather?

The 1460 has a taller ankle shaft and laces that close over the foot. The Blundstone is unlined, so it is less warm.

Do both come in women's sizing?

Yes. The 1460 is sold as a women's boot, and the Blundstone 500 is sold in women's sizes.

Dr. Martens 1460 Women's Boot vs Blundstone Women's Original 500 Chelsea Boot

Buy the Dr. Martens 1460 if you want a lace-up combat boot with a patent leather finish and a lower price. Buy the Blundstone 500 if you want a pull-on Chelsea boot that is water-resistant and easier to get on and off. As of November 7, 2026, the 1460 is $120.00 at eBay and the 500 is $209.95 at Amazon, so the Blundstone costs about $90 more.

Today the Dr. Martens 1460 Women's Boot costs $89.95 less at its best price.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.