- Which is better for pet hair?
- Both handle pet hair. The Dyson's Digital Motorbar head has anti-tangle technology that removes wrapped hair as you clean. The Shark's DuoClean Detect nozzle uses two brushrolls for strong hair pickup and comes with a Pet Multi-Tool.
- Which is better for allergies?
- The Dyson. It has fully sealed whole-machine HEPA filtration rated to trap 99.99% of microscopic dust and allergens. The Shark has a post-motor HEPA filter, but its pre-motor filtration is washable foam, not a sealed system.
- Is the Dyson worth the extra money?
- Only if sealed HEPA filtration and the laser hard-floor head matter to you. Otherwise the Shark costs about $115 less at the best new price and adds a 5-year warranty, a bigger bin and a bending wand.
- Which has longer battery life?
- The Shark, at up to 70 minutes in Eco mode. Dyson states up to 60 minutes of fade-free runtime in the description, though the spec sheet lists 120 minutes. Both figures are best-case, not on max power.
- Which is easier to use under furniture?
- The Shark. Its MultiFLEX wand bends to reach under low furniture and folds for storage. The Dyson uses a standard wand and relies on the handheld conversion for tight spots.
- Which holds more dirt?
- The Shark, with a 0.7 qt dust cup. The Dyson holds 0.2 gal, about 0.8 qt by conversion, but its listed capacity is smaller in practice and it empties point-and-shoot.