Which is better for long backpacking trips?

The Lowa Ferrox GTX Mid. Its MONOWRAP frame and high cut support the ankle and a loaded pack better than the mid-cut North Face.

Which keeps feet drier?

The North Face has a named Gore-Tex 3L membrane and seam-sealed construction. The Lowa is waterproof too, but the spec sheet does not name its membrane.

Which is better for rocky, scrambly trails?

The North Face, thanks to its ballistic-rubber toe cap and SKYCORE rock guard. The Lowa has no listed toe protection.

Is the Lowa worth the extra?

It is not extra right now. The Lowa tracked at $74.39 to $83.98 since October 31, below the North Face's $89.99.

Hard to say from specs. The North Face uses a Cordura ripstop upper with rubber overlays; the Lowa uses synthetic leather and textile over a DynaPU midsole. Both are built for trail use.

Which suits fast day hikes?

The North Face. It is the lighter, more flexible mid-cut boot, while the Lowa is stiffer and higher-cut.

The North Face Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX vs Lowa Ferrox GTX Mid Hiking Boots

Buy the North Face Offtrail Hike LT Mid if you want a light, well-armored waterproof hiker with a rock guard and a proven Gore-Tex membrane. Buy the Lowa Ferrox GTX Mid if you want a stiffer, more supportive boot with MONOWRAP and a grippy Multi Trac sole, and you can find it near its low. On price, the Lowa has tracked lower: $74.39 at its lowest since October 31 versus $89.99 for the North Face since October 28.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.