Which is better for rocky trails?

The North Face Offtrail Hike LT Mid. It adds an integrated SKYCORE rock guard and a ballistic-rubber toe cap, which the Lowa does not list.

Which is warmer in cold weather?

The Lowa Taurus Pro GTX Mid. It lists cold padding; the North Face boot lists no insulation.

Which has better owner ratings?

The North Face scores higher at 4.6 of 5, but from 50 ratings. The Lowa sits at 4.4 of 5 from 96 ratings, so its score rests on more owners.

Are both fully waterproof?

Yes. The North Face uses a GORE-TEX 3L membrane with seam-sealed construction, and the Lowa is listed as waterproof with a GORE-TEX Mid build.

Is the Lowa worth the savings?

It is only $2.26 cheaper at $87.73 versus $89.99, so pick on fit and materials rather than price.

The Lowa's split leather should resist scuffs well, while the North Face's ripstop and rubber toe cap resist rock damage. Neither maker publishes a lifespan figure.

The North Face Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX vs Lowa Women's Taurus Pro GTX Mid

Both are women's mid-cut GORE-TEX hiking boots with 5 mm lugs, so the choice comes down to fit and materials. The North Face Offtrail Hike LT Mid has a lighter ripstop upper, a rock guard and a ballistic-rubber toe cap, and it scores slightly higher on fewer ratings. The Lowa Taurus Pro GTX Mid uses split leather and fabric with cold padding and has nearly twice as many ratings. Prices are close: $89.99 at Sierra for the North Face and $87.73 for the Lowa, both as of October 28, 2026.

Ask our shopping agent

It checks today's price at every store, compares the alternatives and answers in about a minute.